On this page

Line up matching editions

Write down publication dates and directions of travel. Compare stops in sequence and flag places where a renamed street could resemble a new stop.

Choose a weekday timetable with a second column for an evening journey. Tie each observation to a place in the source, such as a page, side, timecode or corner of a frame. A record that says where a detail was found is useful even when the immediate interpretation changes. It also saves the next reader from starting the search again at the first page.

The old cross-town route

Stops appearing in only that column may belong to a variant. Keep a note of anything you expected to see but could not establish. A missing date or an uncertain location is easier to revisit when your record says which part of the object you inspected. You can then look for uncovered details instead of repeating the same search on the same material.

Distinguish variants from changes

Check symbols, day columns and footnotes for school trips or evening branches. A special trip can differ substantially from the main service.

Published hours can change without the route moving geographically. The most helpful comparison preserves order. Use the source order for transcriptions and marks, and create a separate chronological or alphabetical view when it helps the reader. This lets you search a useful index while returning to the original arrangement if the relationship between adjacent items becomes important.

Test what the old cross-town route establishes

Trace the common section before adding branches in different pen colours. Ask a reader to verify a small part of your work against the source without seeing your conclusion first. They may notice how a word, date or position was framed on the original. Add a separate note where two competent readers differ, so a later correction has somewhere to go without overwriting the earlier reasoning.

Record the differences around the old cross-town route

Compare the diagram with an edition that uses the same services. Start by keeping an untouched image or recording of the whole item. Any enlargement or contrast adjustment belongs with a working copy that identifies its source. This gives a future reader the chance to evaluate a faint character or an ambiguous detail without relying solely on the edited view.

The second trial for the old cross-town route

Use a short descriptive filename alongside your record number and keep the two linked. Avoid using the proposed interpretation as the only identifier. An uncertain author, place or date may change when someone sees an overlooked clue, but the connection between the item and earlier notes should remain easy to follow. Give one entry to a reader who has never handled the material. They should be able to find the source, distinguish your wording from its wording and see the reason for your conclusion. If they ask whether a detail came from the item itself or a later recollection, add that distinction where they first needed it. Keep route termini under their printed names. A present-day map can use newer spellings in a separate legend. Finish with enough information to find the source and understand what you did to it. Include the identifier, location, date of inspection and the state of unfinished work. If the material could be shared more broadly later, keep a place for permission and credit information alongside its public description.

Write a handover for the old cross-town route

Draw one comparison showing places served in both editions and places found in just one. Reference an image by its whole item and by the region you want someone to inspect. A citation that points to a catalogue number alone can be hard to use when there are several sides or panels. Include a visual landmark in addition to an image identifier where the region does not have a printed number.